Subscribe      List an Event or Business      Invite a Writer      Write for WN      Writers      Other Locations      HubGarden      Recipes

West of Memphis - Film Review

Home > Everywhere > Movie Reviews | Film Reviews | Cinema
by Maddy Butler (subscribe)
A Sydney based writer, director, actor. Loves going out and exploring what Sydney has to offer.
Published February 7th 2013
A true story of murder, confusion and injustice


Does the justice system fail us? Can wrongs be righted? Who really killed the three little boys found in a creek in West Memphis in 1993?

These are questions posed by Amy Berg in her documentary 'West of Memphis', a film, not for the fainthearted, that speaks of a horrific murder and a horrific miscarriage of justice.

One afternoon in 1993 in Robin Hood Hills, West Memphis, Arkansas, three 8-year old boys set out on their own to play together and never returned home. Their bodies were found the next day in a small creek, tied up and mutilated. Not surprisingly, the town was in an uproar. Police believed the murders to be related to a satanic ritual and soon after arrested three teenagers, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley Jr. The boys were purported to have satanic leanings and Misskelley gave a damning statement that put them at the scene of the crime. The truth seemed clear and Echols received a death sentence, with Baldwin and Misskelley being given life sentences.

Photograph: Jeff Dailey / Sony Pictures Classics


However, as is so often the case with murder trials, the truth is never clear. This was something to which I had grown accustomed after watching Werner Herzog's documentary TV series 'On Death Row' and film 'Into the Abyss'. People lie on the stand, evidence can be misconstrued or incomplete and those deemed guilty might in fact be innocent.

Such as with the 'West Memphis Three', as Echols, Baldwin and Misskelley came to be known. Berg takes us back to the past, starting with the murders, and leads up to the present, through the murder trial, appeals and new investigations. In 2006, after Echols' wife Lorri Davis had exhausted most appeal options, Peter Jackson (yes, of 'Lord of the Rings') and Fran Walsh funded a new enquiry into the case and a DNA appeal.


Photograph: Olivia Fougeirol / Sony Pictures Classics


Berg weaves together the broken fragments of the story with new evidence: expert pathologists shed new light on the cause behind the boys' mutilations, previous witnesses recant their statements and Echols', Baldwin's and Misskelley's DNA is not found at the scene of the crime. Although Berg's bias is evident, she shows us that there is no one definite side to this story, by including interviews with the original judge, prosecutor and a jury member who still believes the West Memphis Three to be guilty. There are still conflicting stories being told, which is unsurprising when we keep in mind the fragility of memory.

It seems ridiculous that three people could have been locked away for almost 20 years for a crime they did not commit, hinting at deeper problems within the American justice system and even within the fabric of our society. The finger is pointed at a few different people as being the culprit behind these crimes, however, a strong case is made for one person in particular. The film's power lies in presenting a cohesive and thorough argument that leaves you with an unsettling feeling, long after you've left the cinema. Mainly because there's still a murderer at large.

Help us improve  Click here if you liked this article  9
*Maddy Butler was invited as a guest
Share: email  facebook  twitter
Why? To see a true tale of crime and injustice
When: Coming to cinemas February 14
Where: Check your local cinema
Cost: Check your local cinema
Your Comment
Articles from other cities
Related
by Nicholas Gordon on 05/02/2013
by Rebecca A. Kerr on 23/01/2013
Popular Articles
Categories
Lists
Questions