list an event 1 million Australian readers every month facebook
Should Adelaide Go High Rise?
Home > Adelaide > Questions | Environment | ArchitectureYour Answer
share your local knowledge
Writer's Answer:
Freelance writer for feature articles, web content and blogs. Specializing in non-fiction articles on a range of subjects including lifestyle, travel, architecture and product reviews.
Published May 16th 2013
Four storeys could work along the Parade (if it was sensitively designed) which has good shops, services and public transport.
Norwood, Payneham & St Peters Council has proposed to allow buildings up to six storeys to be built on The Parade; buildings between five and 10 storeys on selected sites in Kent Town and buildings up to four storeys along the Linear Park. The changes would be in line with the State Government's 30-Year Plan, which predicts a population increase of 560,000 across greater Adelaide.
I'm a bit surprised at the public outrage over this. Do people really expect to live in a major city in the CBD in a house on a single allotment? In Europe it is very common to have 4-6 storey apartment blocks in the CBD and surrounds of major cities.
Hackney Lodge at no 1 North terrace Kent Town with the ugly 10 storey North terrace house in the background. I'm surprised the Hackney Lodge site has not been developed into more modern high rise apartments being so close to the CBD.
This attractive looking development on the former Channel 7 site is now to be scaled back in size with the Real estate agents refunding deposits. Image courtesy of Tecvs Architects website
Air apartments on Greenhill rd is a great example of converting an existing office building (ETSA) into a modern multi- story apartment complex.
There is a strong argument for having more people living in the CBD and surrounds. It reduces urban sprawl, puts less strain on public transport (reducing the commute to work), brings life into the city after hours, and attracts new business to support the additional population.
The Watson. This existing Transport SA office building at Walkerville is being converted into modern apartments. Although it was obviously cheaper to retain the existing shell, a brand new building would have given the opportunity to design something more aesthetically pleasing.
The Adelaide City Council has recently weighed into the debate today on Adelaide Now arguing that high rise buildings around the parklands will spoil vistas to the Adelaide hills.
What do you think? Leave a comment.
Related Articles
Perhaps the root of the problem is that nobody asked the electors what they felt about increasing the population by that 560,000? It presumably won't happen naturally.
It seems quite ironic that the Federal Government spends billions to encourage sustainability, while the State Government and Property Council simply would like us to produce as many babies as humanly possible to keep workers in employment and property developers comfortably wealthy in their castles.
They don't seem to understand that there are finite resources on the planet.
It's not rocket science to understand motivations here!
It seems quite ironic that the Federal Government spends billions to encourage sustainability, while the State Government and Property Council simply would like us to produce as many babies as humanly possible to keep workers in employment and property developers comfortably wealthy in their castles.
They don't seem to understand that there are finite resources on the planet.
It's not rocket science to understand motivations here!
by Dave Walsh (score: 4|10926) 1887 days ago
I think Adelaide needs to increase its population, but not outward as it has in the past: there are vast underdeveloped areas in the western suburbs virtually devoid of life, which could be redeveloped with medium density housing up to say 3-6 levels. People also want a mix of residential styles and not everyone can afford an inner urban house on 600 sqm. We need to increase density, to go up, to increase efficiency in all respects but we need to do it sensitively, with predetermined and clear rules. People have said medium density produces social ills- well this would mean that 99% of the glamourous cities of the world are just pits of depravity. And this is worse than the wasteland of the north western suburbs? I don't think so. high rise does not have to be staright up and down blocks of horror- they can be terraced wonderlands with hanging gardens and zero carbon footprint, if people want them to be. blocking views to the hills?: I was driving up Greenhill road, and the last thing on my mind was the hills: rather the insidious tailgaiters and the need to drive in peak hour petrol sniffing mayhem were my concerns, and if I got out and walked, the view to the hills was blocked by a bunch of gratuitously ugly commericial exercises in egoism...and if I crossed to the parkland side of the road, I would have been somewhat concerned about my safety- so I stayed on the south side and put up with the lame attempts at stained '80's architecture. sometimes I think Adelaide needs to go "vertical", just to give the Architects some scope to design something decent, rather than the squat poo brown horizontality that characterises Adelaide and its inner suburbs. We need a bit of razzamataz!!
by blove (score: 0|9) 1884 days ago
Categories
Writer Topics
Articles from other cities
Featured
Foodi Photoh Classie
